Legal Opinion

Hein v. Luther

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The plaintiff contends and the trial court held that under the provisions of sec 40.34 (1), Stats., *89the defendant district was obliged to furnish transportation irrespective of whether or not the electors had authorized it so to do. The defendant district contends that under the provisions of said section the board is under no legal duty to furnish transportation unless and until it has been authorized so to do by vote of the district and funds provided for such purpose.

The determination of the issues raised turns upon the interpretation to be placed upon sec. 40.34 (1) :

“The school district…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Langen v. BoddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wisniewski v. RossierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lanphier v. Tracy Consolidated School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API