Mullins v. State

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Byron Mullins guilty of armed robbery, hijacking a motor vehicle, and theft by taking. Mullins appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. He also argues that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence and committed a charging error. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. In reviewing a defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence.…