Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1898No. 11,495PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Petition in the supreme court to compel respondent, as county auditor for Cass county, to place petitioner’s name on the official ballot as a candidate for county commissioner, or to show cause why this should not be done.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

The petitioner alleges that he was duly nominated by the People’s party as a candidate for county commissioner of the county of Cass, and filed his nominating certificate, but that the county auditor refuses to put his name on the official ballot. An order to show cause was issued to the auditor by me under G. S. 1894, § 48.

*56The auditor in his return states that Cass county was organized under Laws 1897, c. 99, and in May, 1897, the governor appointed five certain named persons as county commissioners for the term of four years each, pursuant to that act; that they qualified and entered on the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Abel v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Evens v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Imsdahl v. WeeksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API