Legal Opinion
Pulinario v. Goord
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 23, 2004No. 03-2958-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
Respondentr-Appellant Glenn Goord appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Weinstein, /.), granting the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Pulinario v. Goord, 291 F.Supp.2d 154 (E.D.N.Y.2003). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
“We review a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. PerezDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Hastings, Adam v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
- Sheehan v. PowersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021