Legal Opinion
Fuchs v. Martin
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 10, 2005No. 49A02-0411-JV-936Published
1Opinion of the Court
836 N.E.2d 1049 (2005)
Jason Edward FUCHS, Appellant-Petitioner,
v.
Megan MARTIN, Appellee-Respondent, and
Cheryl Martin, Appellee-Intervenor.
No. 49A02-0411-JV-936.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
November 10, 2005.
Bryan Lee Ciyou, Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., Indianapolis, IN, Attorney, for Appellant.
Roger A. Young, Young & Young, Franklin, IN, Attorney for Appellee Megan Martin.
Melanie K. Reichert, Broyles Kight & Ricafort, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellee Cheryl Martin.
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Jason Edward Fuchs ("Father") appeals the trial court's judgment in Fuchs' paternity action against Megan…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Guardianship of B.H.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Watson v. Auto Advisors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Marriage of Bojrab v. BojrabIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Carter v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Fuchs v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005