Legal Opinion

Russell v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 22, 1971Published

1Opinion of the Court

STEINFELD, Judge.

Appellant Russell, Jr. appeals from an order overruling his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to RCr 11.42. It is our opinion that appellant’s complaints are without merit.

Appellant alleged in his post-conviction proceedings that he was deprived of his constitutional right to have a preliminary hearing. He was charged with two counts of indecent and immoral practices with another (KRS 435.105). The trial court found that the record indicated the appellant was given a preliminary hearing on one count of the charge on April 8, 1970, and that he was present and repre*260sented by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  3. Brister v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API