Legal Opinion
Meeks v. Ellis
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided November 19, 1999No. 1998-CA-001634-MRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDDLESTON, J.
Reginald K. Meeks appeals from a Jefferson Circuit Court order that denied his Kentucky Rule of Civil Procedure (CR) 60.02(b) motion to relieve him from its final order declaring his 1996 nomination as the Democratic candidate for 11th Ward Alderman in the City of Louisville void. The motion is based on what Meeks describes as newly discovered evidence.
CR 60.02(b) authorizes a circuit court to reheve a party from its final judgment or order upon the ground of newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hopkins v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
- Fletcher v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973
- Noble v. MeagherKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Fletcher v. TeaterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
- Ellis v. MeeksKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HarrisKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
- Lezlea Ross v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Seton Family of Hospitals, D/B/A Seton Medical Center v. Beverly J. Haywood, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015