Legal Opinion

Perley v. Wing

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 6, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The defendant concedes that his several exceptions, raise only a single question of law, i. e., whether there was any evidence from which it might be found that N. L. Wing indorsed the note for the accommodation of the makers. Both parties agree that this question is decisive of the case, and this appears to be correct, for the only other person for whose accommodation the note might have been signed was the plaintiff, and the law is well settled that, the accommodation party is not liable to the party accommodated either at common law (8 C. J. 259, s. 409; Woodward v. Bixby, 68 N. H. 219),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neal v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Skagit State Bank v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Goodman v. GaullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Rea v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Lockwood v. TwitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Athas v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Iglehart v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Amodeo v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API