Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Board of Professional Responsibility

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Chief Justice.

The Board of Professional Responsibility charged Harry Parker Stanley with preparation of usurious notes, the lending of money to a client without full disclosure, the failure to deal honestly and candidly with clients, the representation of both the victim and defendant in a criminal matter, incompetency for legal representation, and conflict of interest. The charges were based upon Stanley’s conduct in three separate episodes.

The charges, resulting in Stanley’s permanent disbarment, were heard by a hearing committee consisting of three lawyers practicing in…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. AlsfelderOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. FultonWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In re GusteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API