Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Santiago, A., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 2019No. 1 EAP 2018PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Todd

The "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine prohibits the admission of evidence at trial that was tainted by unconstitutional actions by law enforcement officials. Certain exceptions, however, exist to this doctrine. In this appeal by allowance, we consider whether a police officer's initial observations of a defendant at the scene of a crime, followed by a warrantless search of a cellular telephone left at the scene, which leads to the discovery of defendant's identity, taints the officer's subsequent in-court identification of the defendant. For the reasons set forth below, we find, under…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Com. v. Lehnerd, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Com. v. Schneider, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Schneider, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. of PA v. K.R. LaskovichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Anderson, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API