Commonwealth v. Santiago, A., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Todd
The "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine prohibits the admission of evidence at trial that was tainted by unconstitutional actions by law enforcement officials. Certain exceptions, however, exist to this doctrine. In this appeal by allowance, we consider whether a police officer's initial observations of a defendant at the scene of a crime, followed by a warrantless search of a cellular telephone left at the scene, which leads to the discovery of defendant's identity, taints the officer's subsequent in-court identification of the defendant. For the reasons set forth below, we find, under…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Com. v. Lehnerd, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Schneider, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Schneider, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. of PA v. K.R. LaskovichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Anderson, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.