Legal Opinion

Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Winsett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 17, 2004No. 2003-CA-002769-MRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARBER, Judge.

The circuit court dismissed Government Employees Insurance Company’s (GEICO) intervening complaint for failure to state a claim because it adjudged that the Statute Of Limitations for bringing the action had expired. We reverse the judgment because the Statute of Limitations is not determinative of the issue of whether GEI-CO’s intervening complaint should have been allowed.

The underlying facts of this case are that GEICO’s insured, Everton L. Sim-monds (Simmonds), was involved in an automobile accident with the Appellees here, Joshua Winsett (Winsett) and Craig Cul-breth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'BRYAN v. HedgespethKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Whitney v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Berry v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Zurich American Insurance Co. v. HaileKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Highways v. All Points Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. H Cargo, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
  2. Glass v. Danny Herman Trucking, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  3. Robinson v. Eastern Express, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  4. Terrell v. UNICO, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API