Haiman v. Gundersheimer
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
The writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of the plaintiff who sued defendant in the court below on a declaration in two counts.
She recovered on the first count. The allegation of this count of the declaration was in effect that the defendant agreed to purchase a certain stock of goods and fixtures, together with the good will of the business of the plaintiff in Pensacola, Florida, and to employ the plaintiff as manager of the business for the period of one year at a salary of $40.00 per week, commencing September 30, 1935; that plaintiff entered into the employment on.that date…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Patterson v. Wenatchee Canning Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- City Council v. Bradley & EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- E. F. Spears & Sons v. WinkleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Gibson & Cunningham v. PurifoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- Telesphere Intern., Inc. v. ScollinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Three Keys, Ltd. v. Kennedy Funding, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Placet, Inc. v. AshtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Austin's Rack, Inc. v. AustinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Video Electronics, Inc. v. TedderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.