Legal Opinion

Ostend Realty Corp. v. Lehman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 22, 1953Published

1Opinion of the CourtHookebt, J.

Petition is dismissed as the landlord, a corporation, does not appear by an attorney as required by section 236 of the Civil Practice Act (Hillside Housing Corp. v. Eisenberger, 173 Misc. 75). The petition has no mention of an attorney. An attorney whose name appears on the precept without designating him as an attorney is insufficient to comply with the statute. There is no proof submitted by the landlord corporation that it has an attorney and/or commenced this proceeding by an attorney. (Gaston & Co. v. All Russian Zemsky Union, 221 App. Div. 732.) The question is properly raised by a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gaston & Co. v. All Russian Zemsky UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Hillside Housing Corp. v. EisenbergerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API