Legal Opinion

Smith v. Adams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1987No. 1382PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue of first impression in this appeal is whether the owner of the fee underlying a township road can maintain an action in ejectment against a cable t.v. company which, with township consent, has placed three utility poles within the public right of way. The trial court held that an action in ejectment could be maintained by the landowner and ordered the removal of the poles from the public right of way. We reverse.

The case was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts. Marjorie Smith is the owner of a seventy-eight (78) acre tract of land in Clifford…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 46 South 52nd Street Corp. v. ManlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Pittsburgh National Bank v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Borough of Scottdale v. National Cable Television Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. City of Lancaster and PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Miller v. NicholsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Miller v. NicholsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. City of Lancaster and PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Strawn v. C. & K. Well Management Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API