Legal Opinion
Stoneman v. Smyth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 3, 1922No. 22,952PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
This is a companion case to that of Lillian M. Stoneman against the same defendants, supra, page 331. It was submitted upon the record therein, and the same disposition must follow, viz.:
The judgment against the defendant and appellant Smyth is affirmed and the judgment in favor of t'he defendant and respondent WashburnCrosby Company is reversed, and the cause is remitted with direction to the court below to enter judgment upon the verdict rendered against said respondent.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Flaaten v. LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923