Legal Opinion

Boren v. Worthen National Bank of Arkansas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 1996No. 95-930Published

1Opinion of the Court

921 S.W.2d 934 (1996)

324 Ark. 416

Stephanie M. BOREN and Kimberly J. Vanbibber, Appellants,

v.

WORTHEN NATIONAL BANK OF ARKANSAS and Worthen Banking Corporation, Appellees.

No. 95-930.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

May 13, 1996.

Sandy S. McMath, Little Rock, for appellants.

Michael E. Aud, Little Rock, for appellees.

ROAF, Justice.

This case presents the issue of a bank's liability for a criminal attack at an automated teller machine ("ATM"). Appellants Stephanie M. Boren and Kimberly J. Vanbibber were shot by a robber while Boren, accompanied by Vanbibber, was transacting business at an ATM owned and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Taco Bell, Inc. v. LannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API