Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1907PublishedCited by 20 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Writ of Error to the Criminal Court of Record for Duval County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

— An information was duly presented in the criminal court of record for Duval county charging Obie Wilson, Alonzo Small, George O’Neal and Collins Austin with grand larceny in one count and with receiving stolen goods knowing them to have been stolen in the second count. George O’Neal and Collins Austin having pleaded not guilty, were tried and the jury rendered the following verdict: “We, the jury, find the defendants guilty, George O’Neal grand larceny and receiving stolen goods, and Collins Austin receiving stolen goods.”

A motion in arrest of judgment on the grounds that (1) no legal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. Long v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  5. Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davis v. Ivey and EstesSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Rentz v. Live Oak BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Licata v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. Bargesser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API