Legal Opinion
Henry v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 15, 2006No. 4D05-4884PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
920 So.2d 1204 (2006)
Tomika HENRY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D05-4884.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
February 15, 2006.
Tomika Henry, Brooksville, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
2Per curiam
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant claimed that her convictions for grand theft and robbery violated double jeopardy because they were committed during the same criminal episode, involved the same victims, and concerned the same jewelry. We agree with the trial…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Hopping v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Wheeler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Safrany v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
4Cited by10 opinions
- Coughlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Mauldin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Black v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Mento v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.