Legal Opinion

Eisenhour v. Cities Service Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1939No. 34,325PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HoCH, J.:

This was an action by a receiver to require specific performance of a contract to purchase an oil and gas lease. Demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence was sustained on the ground that the receiver was not in a position to carry out his own part of the contract and that therefore the respondent would not be required to do so. Plaintiff appeals.

The issue arose in an ancillary proceeding in which the receiver, Eisenhour, had been named to take charge of certain mineral rights in Ellis county, Kansas, said to be owned by nonresidents, E. E. Boyle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Higgins v. . EagletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Williams v. BrickerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. McNutt v. NellansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Linscott v. MosemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Oppenheimer v. Knepper Realty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Darby v. KeeranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. TRI-STATE HOTEL CO., INC v. Sphinx Investment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Ayers v. GraffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Barrett v. McMannisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Peatling v. BairdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API