Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Baird

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FEOM DAVIDSON. Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Davidson County. —John Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

This is a hill by an intermediate vendor of land against his immediate grantor for breach of covenant of title. A demurrer was interposed on behalf of the defendant, which was sustained by the chancellor, and complainant’s bill dismissed. The cause is before this court on appeal of the complainant, assigning the action of the chancellor in dismissing his hill as error.

Complainant, Morrow, alleges in his bill that on the 22d day of June, 1888, he purchased of defendant, Baird, for the consideration of $5,000, a tract of land in Franklin county, Tennessee, estimated to contain 5,000 acres.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suydam v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  2. Booth v. StarrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
  3. Redwine v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  4. Vancourt v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Cobb Wife v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
  3. Thompson v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  4. Kenyon v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
  5. Brown v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API