Legal Opinion

McBride v. Saylin

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1936No. L. A. No. 15552PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

In this case a petition for hearing after decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One, was granted for the reason that there appeared to be some merit in the contention of the defendants that the District Court of Appeal, in concluding that the evidence showed a prima facie cause of actionable malpractice, applied a test not sanctioned by the decided cases, and further because of the pendency before this court at that time of a petition for hearing in the case of Forbis v. Holzman, (Cal. App.) 45 Pac. (2d) 215, which has now been finally determined.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Patterson v. MarcusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API