Marshall v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 34 — PETITION EQUITY — APPEAL FROM WOODFORD CIRCUIT COURT. cited 18 B. Monroe, 306 ; 2 Metcalfe, 252; Rev. Statutes, chap. 47, art. 2.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stites
The debt sued for is evidenced by writing, signed by the husband and wife. It is charged, and not denied, that the *334“Buck Pond” farm, on which the family of appellant, including herself and husband, lived, needed repairs; “that the fences and buildings, including the dwelling and out-houses on the same, were in a ruinous and dilapidated condition; that plank and lumber were necessary to make said dwelling comfortable, and the other houses fit for use in a comfortable manner, and to prevent the same from falling into complete ruin, and that it was necessary for the comfortable and proper use…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Stone v. SanbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870