Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State ex rel. Sartain

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 21, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

In November, 1920, the County Commissioners of Bay County entered into contract with. Sartain, Dobson and Reese to reconstruct the court house of said county for an agreed sum. The work was completed, accepted and final settlement had when it was found that there was a balance due the contractors of $12,000.00. The commissioners paid the contractors $4,000.00 cash. The contractors transferred $2,000.00 of said claim to Frank Mosley and the commissioners then agreed to sell and deliver to the contractor at private sale sufficient county warrants at 90 cents in the dollar to satisfy the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  2. Arnott v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Erskine v. Steele CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Family Bank of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. The County of Leon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Excise Board of Cheek County v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. State v. Family Bank of HallandaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Procedo Gesellschaft Fur Exportfactoring, D. Klindworth MBH v. Juli-And Holding of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API