Legal Opinion

State v. Briggs

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1915No. 2604PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Utah. County; Hon. A. B. Morgan, Judge. Lawrence Briggs was convicted of crime, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The appellant was prosecuted and convi,cted in the justice’s court of American Fork precinct for having unlawfully sold intoxicating liquors. He appealed to the district court of Utah County, and upon a trial to a jury was again convicted and now appeals to this court. In view that the case originated in the justice’s court, we, under our Constitution, are prohibited from inquiring into any question, except the validity of the law upon which the conviction and judgment are based. The complaint against appellant was based upon chapter 106, Laws of Utah 1911, p. 152, which is a so-called local…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. People v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Grandy v. CaseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Ex parte WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West Valley City v. StreeterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  2. Shaw v. Orem CityUtah Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API