Legal Opinion

People v. Goncalves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In the absence of a request by defendant, the trial court may not instruct the jury that no unfavorable inference may be drawn from defendant’s decision not to testify (CPL 300.10 [2]). Defendant did not request the charge and it was thus error for the court to so instruct the jury. Given the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, however, "there is no reasonable possibility that the error might have contributed to defendant’s conviction” (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237; see also, People v Koberstein, 66 NY2d 989). We find, therefore, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. KobersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. RozanskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. MullallyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API