Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 1983No. 82-2888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOARDMAN, Judge.

Victor Goldstein appeals his judgment and sentence for second degree grand theft, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4). We affirm the conviction but remand for correction of sentence.

In his motion, which the state did not traverse, appellant asserted that the following facts constituted entrapment as a matter of law:

1. On the date listed in the information, appellant was in the vicinity of the Greyhound Bus Station on the corner of Morgan and Polk Streets.

2. Tampa Police Det. Hogue,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. State v. CasperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. State v. CruzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. State v. SokosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Grine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Teague v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Goldstein v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API