Legal Opinion

Smiley v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 7, 2010No. 1081502PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Justice.

The State of Alabama, pursuant to Rule 39, Ala. RApp. P., petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in reversing the trial court’s judgment revoking Troy Andrew Smiley’s probation. We *567hold that it did, and we reverse and remand.

Underlying Facts and Procedural History

On June 13, 2008, Smiley pleaded guilty in the Lee Circuit Court to the unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. He was sentenced to one year’s imprisonment; however, the trial court suspended the sentence and placed Smiley on supervised probation for one…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BryowskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Clark v. Albertville Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Ex Parte AnonymousSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. State Department of Human Resources v. R.E.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Julio Mantez v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  2. Legendre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  3. Anthony Theo Wallace, Jr. v. State of AlabamaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2026
  4. Smiley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API