Baldwin Drainage Dist. v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
When this controversy was here before1 as a part of several appeals, we affirmed all of the judgments except those involved in the appeals of I. Otto Brown, saying as to them: “The circumstance which distinguishes Brown’s appeal from the others is this: Under the Act of 1913, the lien created in favor of drainage taxes was made subordinate to the lien of state and county taxes. By an amendment in 1927, F.S.A. Sec. 298.41, the drainage-tax lien was placed on a parity with state and county tax liens. The Florida Supreme Court has ruled that a tax deed based on a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Webster Lumber Co. v. LincolnSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Kersh Lake Drainage District v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- City of Sanford v. DialSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Stuart v. StephanusSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Baldwin Drainage District v. MacClenny Turpentine Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Marion County, Fla.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- Smithers v. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954