Legal Opinion

State v. Green

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1976No. 7526SC879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the court erred in hearing testimony by defendant’s probation officer concerning defendant’s admitted use of heroin without first conducting a voir dire examination to ascertain whether the defendant’s constitutional rights had been abridged. “The Sixth Amendment, which guarantees to the accused ‘in all criminal prosecutions’ a speedy and public trial ‘by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,’ is inapposite here.” State v. Braswell, 283 N.C. 332, 196 S.E. 2d 185 (1973). Defendant’s contention in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Parole Application of TrantinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. GallowaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. People v. DeadmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. People v. KingColorado Court of Appeals · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API