Legal Opinion

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Hussey

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1991No. 95 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas which denied the post-trial motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and in arrest of judgment filed by Appellant herein, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA). The trial court’s order is reversed. 1

Appellee, Michael Hussey, received injuries after being slashed by a knife or razor during a confrontation on the platform of a SEPTA subway station in the City of Philadelphia involving Hussey and two friends and some passengers of a SEPTA subway train that had just…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. In Re the Upset Sale of Properties Against Which Delinquent 1981 Taxes Were Returned to the Tax Claim Unit on or About the First Monday of May, 1982Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. McCormick v. Northeastern BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Sonnenberg v. Erie Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. O'NeillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Rooney v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. The Arches Condominium Association v. L. RobinsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Flamer v. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Black v. Shrewsbury BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API