Legal Opinion

Plattenburg v. Dykes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 2001No. 1D00-4972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKahn, J.

The issue in this automobile accident case is whether Bussie Evans can be held vicariously liable in tort.to appellants under Florida’s common law dangerous in-strumentalities doctrine. Andrew Dykes gained possession of an automobile after Bussie Evans told Dykes that he could have the car if he would remove it from Evans’ driveway. In furtherance of this, Evans left the keys, the owner’s manual, the certificate of title, and the registration in the car. Dykes in fact took possession of the car and removed it. Evans immediately cancelled the automobile insurance covering the car. Several days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. RS Evans, Jacksonville, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Aurbach v. GallinaSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Hertz Corp. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Palm Beach Auto Brokers, Inc. v. DeCarloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert L. Christensen v. Mary Jo BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. Bowen v. Taylor-ChristensenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Bowen v. Taylor-ChristensenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API