Legal Opinion
United States v. Hansel
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 7, 1998No. 96-CV-0775Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
MeAVOY, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 7, 1996, the United States (the “Government”) instituted an action pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 7401 and 7403 to: (1) reduce to judgment tax assessments made against Sheldon G. Hansel; (2) set aside fraudulent transfers by Sheldon G. Hansel to the other four named defendants; and (3) obtain judgments against Christy Hansel, Grant Hansel, Shelley Hansel and Eunice Hansel in amounts equal to the value of certain shares of stock conveyed to them, plus dividends, profits, and appreciation in the value of the stock.
By Decision and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- L.B. Foster Company v. America Piles, Inc., Grace Industries, Inc., Michael J. Amoruso, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Lorraine C. Cullen v. Joseph P. Margiotta, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Asher v. RuppaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Hogan v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Arlinghaus v. RitenourCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.