Legal Opinion
Succession of Veal
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 12, 1970No. 3649PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REDMANN, Judge.
Robert A. Morgan appeals from a judgment dismissing his opposition to and ordering the probate of a will made by his wife.
Appellant contends the will is invalid in form. We so hold, and therefore do not discuss appellant’s alternate attacks.
The will purports to be in the additional form authorized by LSA-R.S. 9:2442, providing, in pertinent part:
“* * * a will shall be valid if in writing * * * and signed by the testator in the presence of a notary public and two witnesses in the following manner:(1) In the presence of the notary and both witnesses the testator shall signify to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Succession of GuidryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Succession of PickettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Succession of SaarelaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Succession of MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Succession of ThibodeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Succession of VealSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Succession of VealSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970