Legal Opinion

Bressler v. Board of Higher Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1945Published

1Per curiam

In two consolidated actions, plaintiffs appeal from an order and a judgment dismissing the complaints on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Equitable relief is asked; defendant in its answers does not allege that plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law; defendant did not. as in Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc. (283 N. Y. 299), move to dismiss for insufficiency before answer. Accordingly, as the complaints sufficiently state causes of action at law (Nelson v. Board of Higher Education of City of N. Y., 263 App. Div. 144, affd. 288 N. Y. 649) and answers have been served…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Nelson v. The Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Nelson v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Perrin v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Kraemer v. World Wide Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API