Richter v. Richter

By Judge Stanley R Klein

This matter remains before this Court, inter alia, on Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Judgment Based Upon Intrinsic Fraud. Defendant Marie M. Richter alleges that Complainant John L. Richter committed peijury during the trial of this matter in February, 1995. Consequently, she asks this Court to vacate its decision, grant her leave to conduct further discovery, and to then hold a full evidentiary hearing, so that she can fully establish the particulars of the alleged peijury. The Court has considered Mrs. Richter’s motion, Mr. Richter’s opposition thereto, Mrs. Richter’s…