Legal Opinion

PNC Bank v. Snoddy

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2003No. 22A05-0208-CV-361PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

PNC Bank, as trustee of the John E. Mitchell Trust ("the Trust"), appeals the trial court's denial of reimbursement from the Trust for attorney fees incurred in defending an action brought by brothers Robert and Mark Snoddy, the Trust's beneficiaries, to prematurely terminate the Trust or to remove PNC as trustee. We affirm.

Issue

The sole restated issue before us is whether the trial court lacked discretion to prevent PNC from recouping its attorney fees from the Trust when PNC successfully defended against the Snoddys' action to terminate the Trust or remove…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jennings v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Malachowski v. Bank One, Indianapolis, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Zaring v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Breneman v. SlusherIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Haas v. Wishmier's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farah, LLC v. Architura Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. In Re Trust Created Under MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API