Gould v. Stafford
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The judgment will have to be reversed because the findings are insufficient. They are not pointed and specific on the issues presented; some of them are contradictory of each other, and some of them are in conflict with the admissions of the pleadings.
As there will probably be another trial of the case, it is proper to notice some of the questions which the court below will again have to consider.
Plaintiff is the owner of land on a natural stream of water called Montecito Creek, and this action is brought' to enjoin defendant, an upper riparian proprietor, from diverting water from a main…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Ortega v. CorderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Turner v. the James Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Gould v. StaffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.