Legal Opinion

Willie Santonio Manders v. Thurman Lee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 14, 2002No. 01-13606Published

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Circuit Judge:

In this § 1983 excessive force case, While Santonio Manders sued Sheriff Winston Peterson in his official capacity for injuries allegedly caused by the Sheriffs use-of-force policy at the jail and failure to train and discipline his deputies in that regard. We conclude that Sheriff Peterson functions as an “arm of the State” in establishing use-of-foree policy at the jail and in training and disciplining his deputies in *1306that regard, and is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity for these particular functions. Thus, we reverse the district court’s denial of summary…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API