Legal Opinion

Bahman Khadjenouri v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1972No. 71-2190PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

The decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying Khadjenouri’s application for termination of deportation proceedings is affirmed.

We hold that Section 241(f) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251(f) does not apply here. There is a difference between fraud after entry and fraud to obtain entry. Ferrante v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 399 F.2d 98 (6th Cir. 1968).

We are not convinced that the petitioner could never again obtain reentry.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Francesco Ferrante v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Francesco Ferrante and Kathy Ferrante v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lourdes Cabuco-Flores v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Genevieve L. Mangabat v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Candido Pereira-Barreira v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. CONNELLYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1984
  4. AGOURBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2015
  5. BOWEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API