Legal Opinion

Sweaney v. Baugher

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1906No. 20,801Published

From Grant Superior Court; H. J. Baulus, Judge. Action by Elizabeth E. Sweaney against James W. Baugher. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §133/Tu Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

—Action by appellant on contract. Answer, discharge in bankruptcy. The finding and judgment for appellee is challenged as not being sustained by sufficient evidence.

The cause was submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts which, in substance, is as follows: On February 3, 1899, appellant was the owner of the equity of redemption in forty acres of land in Wells county and indebted to appellee in the sum of $100. At the same time appellee was the owner of a lot in Marion, encumbered by mortgage for $600 to the Marion Building & Loan Association. On said date the parties entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moch v. Market St. Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901
  2. Timothy L. MacE in Error v. Jared WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Smith v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. In re GersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API