Legal Opinion
Hannah v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-1361(JCH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Doc. No. 30)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Kim Hannah (“Hannah”), Tom Irving (“Irving”), and Michael (“Barham”), (collectively, “the plaintiffs”), bring this action against defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (collectively, “Wal-Mart”). The plaintiffs allege that they were subjected to race discrimination and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq, the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, Conn. GemStat. § 46a-60 et seq.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Sellers v. M.C. Floor Crafters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edner v. NYCTA-MTADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015