Legal Opinion

Swindell & Co. v. Bainbridge State Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1908No. 1039, 1040, 1041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to amend, etc., from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Harrell. January 29, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. The Bainbridge State Bank brought three suits in the city-court of Bainbridge, against E. Swindell & Company, on notes. Demurrers to the pleas were sustained, and judgments were thereupon rendered in favor of the bank. Swindell & Company sued out writs of error to this court, and this court, without condition or direction, affirmed the judgments of the lower court (3 Ga. App. 364 (60 S. E. 13)). When a motion was made in the Ibwer court to make the remittiturs from this court t’he judgments of that court, Swindell & Company offered to amend the pleas which had been stricken on demurrer,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. PatersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Swindell & Co. v. Bainbridge State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. ChaneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Augusta Railway Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Cooper v. Portner Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rahal v. TitusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Hixon v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API