Legal Opinion

Metz v. Hawkins

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1943No. 6895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondent intervener, Thiessen Land Company, obtained a money judgment against the Metz Corporation, which upon appeal was affirmed. (Thiessen Land Co. v. Metz Livestock Co., 61 Ida. 161, 99 Pac. (2d) 50.) To enforce payment of that judgment execution was thereafter levied. The present action was instituted by appellant to recover against the sheriff and his surety for the alleged wrongful levy under that execution upon personal property which appellant insists belonged to him personally and not to the corporation, execution debtor. Respondent Thiessen Land Company intervened, setting up…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carver v. KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Tomita v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Hayhurst v. BoydIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Sandstrom v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. South Side Live Stock Loan Co. v. IversonIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tom Nakamura, Inc. v. G. & G. PRODUCE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph v. LeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API