Legal Opinion

Republic of Hawaii v. Pahu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions prom Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

CIRCUIT JUDGE WHITING.

The defendant, with two others, was prosecuted on a charge of larceny, and at the close of the testimony for the prosecution *75counsel for defendant Palm moved tile Court to order a verdict for defendant and also to order the defendant discharged, which motions were overruled and defendant duly excepted. The defendant did not rest his case but proceeded with the trial and produced testimony in his behalf. A verdict of guilty was found by the jury against Pahu, to which he duly excepted as contrary to the law and the evidence, and a motion for a new…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Territory of Hawaii v. RobelloHawaii Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Territory v. MarksHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bannister v. LucasHawaii Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API