Legal Opinion

Hanover Fire Insurance v. Drake

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 28, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.

Margaret C. Drake and H. T. Drake, sometimes hereinafter called the plaintiffs, brought this action at law against The Hanover Fire Insurance Company, hereinafter called the Insurance Company, to recover under a fire insurance policy the loss of and damage to certain of their household furniture and personal effects, resulting from a fire which occurred at the residence of the plaintiffs in Portsmouth.

The declaration contained two counts. The first alleged that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover under the terms of the policy the damage to or loss of their property, amounting to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Providence Washington Insurance v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. PipkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. Robinett & GreenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smithson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. Ins. Comm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Eden Corporation v. Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1972
  5. RMBS Recovery Holdings, I, LLC v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API