Legal Opinion

Standard Insurance v. City of Hillsboro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 1989No. LUBA 88-120; CA A60644PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s decision that the City of Hillsboro lacked jurisdiction to consider a petition for reconsideration of, or to make final Washington County’s approval of, an amendment to county’s comprehensive plan map.1 The county governing body made its decision on November 8, 1988. Petitions for reconsideration were filed with the county on November 8 and November 9. The county did not act on the petitions and, on November 9, the area affected by the proposed amendment was annexed to the city.

Under sections 211-2.1 and 211-2.2 of the county Community Development Code:

“If no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Multnomah County v. City of FairviewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Standard Insurance v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Standard Insurance v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API