Legal Opinion

Offill v. Routh

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 1, 1926No. 11,513PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

There was default in payment of a note secured by a real estate mortgage; foreclosure and deficiency judgment against a subsequent purchaser; allowance by the county court, of the unpaid balance, against the estate of the maker; appeal therefrom and judgment of affirmance by the district court. This writ is sued out to review that judgment and the cause is now before us on application for supersedeas. Defendant in error is hereinafter referred to as plaintiff.

The material facts are agreed to and are as follows: (1) January 11, 1921, James M. Offill gave to plaintiff his $2,500 note, secured…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. McRaeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  2. Milner Bank & Trust Co. v. Estate of WhippleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ross v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Watts v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Ross v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API