Hayek v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, Justice.
In this matter, we conclude that the trial court erred in ruling that, because Uniform Traffic Citations (“UTCs”) filed with the state court clerk’s office did not trigger the accused’s statutory right to demand a speedy trial, the accused’s demand was premature. That ruling contradicted this Court’s express holding in State v. Gerbert 1 that the statutory right to demand a speedy trial of a traffic offense attaches when a UTC is filed with the court. The trial court’s ruling also impeded the accused’s due process right to know when the State’s formal prosecution against him…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. GerbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- HCA Health Services of Georgia, Inc. v. RoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Meservey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Parks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- State v. BloodsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.