Legal Opinion

Vinco Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 4, 2002No. Docket No. 01-7411PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

The plaintiff, Vinco, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, following a bench trial, holding that the defendant insurance companies (collectively “Royal”)1 are not required to indemnify Vinco for liability it incurred with respect to a December 1991 accident at a Norwalk Community College construction project. On appeal, Vinco argues that the district court’s finding that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. KinsellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. SKW Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Rogers Investment Co. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dan Ryan Builders West Virginia LLC v. Main Street America Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  2. Dan Ryan Builders West Virginia LLC v. Main Street America Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  3. Dan Ryan Builders West Virginia LLC v. Main Street America Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  4. Dan Ryan Builders West Virginia LLC v. Main Street America Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  5. Dan Ryan Builders West Virginia LLC v. Main Street America Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API