Legal Opinion

Perry v. Myer

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1902Published

Application by Charles H. Perry to enforce an attorney’s lien.

1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.

This is an application to the court to declare and enforce a lien for the moving attorney’s services. Under the Code as it now stands, and under the decisions, I think the proceeding out of which the claim arose is a special proceeding. Code Civ. Proc. § 3334.

The defendant, John C. Myer, is a constable in the city of Oneida, in this county. Having performed services as. such constable, his claim was duly presented for adjustment to the proper auditing board of the city of Oneida, and a large portion of said claim was rejected by said board. From that decision an appeal, pursuant to statute,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peri v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Matter of KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. In re the Board of Street Opening & ImprovementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Deering v. SchreyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API